Peter Dutton is the current Leader of the Opposition and he could very well be the next Prime Minister of Australia. With climate change already wreaking havoc on our coasts, communities, and ecosystems, the question has to be asked: can we trust him to lead Australia through the climate crisis?
Let’s break it down.
A quick look at Dutton’s climate record
Peter Dutton has been a long-time member of the Liberal-National Coalition, a group that has historically dragged its feet on meaningful climate action.
During his time in government, Dutton voted consistently against policies designed to reduce emissions, support renewable energy, or transition away from fossil fuels. He’s also made headlines for downplaying the impacts of climate change or ignoring them altogether.
His voting record includes:
- Voting against increasing investment in renewable energy
- Voting for new coal and gas projects
- Opposing stronger environmental protections
- Being absent from major climate discussions, both metaphorically and sometimes literally
While he now says he supports “sensible climate policy,” the track record suggests otherwise.
TL;DR: Dutton’s climate record is more coal than clean. He’s shown little interest in real action when it’s mattered.
What is Dutton’s current stance?
Lately, Peter Dutton has been trying to rebrand. He’s been talking about “practical solutions” and “technology, not taxes.” But when you look closely, the policies are vague, and the details are missing.
He’s expressed support for nuclear energy (a very slow and expensive option), and his party continues to back new gas projects. The Coalition has also opposed ambitious emissions reduction targets, arguing they’re too costly for the economy.
So while there’s a lot of talk about “balance,” what we’re not hearing is a clear plan to phase out fossil fuels, hit net-zero targets, or protect communities already on the front lines of climate disasters.
TL;DR: Dutton says he supports action but it’s mostly talk. The policies either don’t exist or lean heavily on delaying tactics.
Can we afford to wait?
Here’s the thing: climate change doesn’t care about political games. Australia is already experiencing hotter summers, longer droughts, more destructive floods, and rising sea levels. Our economy, health systems, agriculture, and biodiversity are all at risk.
We need leaders who understand the urgency and are willing to take bold, science-backed action. Not those who treat it like a political nuisance.
Waiting for “better technology” or “cheaper options” is a dangerous gamble. We already have the tools to act, we just need the political will.
TL;DR: Time is not on our side. Half-measures and political hedging won’t cut it.
So, can we trust Peter Dutton?
In short: not really. Not unless he dramatically changes course.
Peter Dutton has consistently failed to take climate change seriously. He’s opposed major climate policies, supported fossil fuel expansion, and offered little in the way of a credible alternative.
Trust is earned through action, not slogans. When it comes to climate, Dutton hasn’t shown the leadership Australia needs.
TL;DR: Based on his record and current positions, Peter Dutton hasn’t earned our trust on climate. We need leadership, not lip service.
Big Climate Questions Australians are Asking
If you’re still on the fence or just want to learn more, you’re not alone. Here are some of the most common follow-up questions readers are asking:
1. What would strong climate leadership actually look like?
Think: real targets based on science, big investments in renewables, no new coal or gas, and plans to support workers and communities during the transition.
2. Are there any climate champions in Australian politics right now?
Yes, there are independents, minor party members, and even a few from the majors who are pushing hard for action. Watch what they vote for, not just what they post online.
3. What can I do if I care about climate but feel stuck politically?
Vote for candidates with strong climate policies, join local groups, divest from fossil fuels, or just start conversations in your community. Every bit helps.
4. Is nuclear energy a viable solution for Australia?
Not in the short term. It’s expensive, slow to build, and comes with waste and safety issues. Renewables are faster and cheaper and they’re ready now.
5. Why is climate policy so political in Australia?
Short answer: fossil fuel lobbyists, media influence, and party politics. It’s frustrating but public pressure does work.
Got more questions? Drop them in the comments or send them through. This is too big an issue to stay silent on and it’s way too important to leave in the hands of people who don’t take it seriously.
